JD VANCE was MAGNIFICENT.
JD'S LIKEABILITY SCORE TOPPED OFF AT 99.9 TONIGHT AND IS RISING!
walz lied about being in Tienmennan Square in China and he wasn't
they fact checked him and he couldn't answer the question,
but rather rambled about how he liked to be a teacher
(I would have liked such an easy, stable, good-paying job, but I've been blacklisted for being a truth-teller)
When they followed up because he didn't answer the question, he rambled more and said he made mistakes.
That brought his likeability score below 50.
"gaslighting" means trying to trick people into thinking they're crazy. It'a form of psychological abuse.
psychobrat stevie wartgo was assigned by the fbi to gaslight me at Manuelito School in Gallup NM but it was obvious too me, so he couldn't do it.
I don't like the use of the word "gaslight."
It is a trend, a practice, in this country to use words which are not understood by most people, but only understood by cliques.
The normal, commonly understood meaning of "gaslight" is "the light given off by a gas flame." Most streetlights used to be gaslight.
Now, this trendy, esoteric use of "gaslight" takes a different meaning from the title of film noir movie, "Gaslight,"
in which the villain tried to convince a person that they were crazy.
Easily understood synonyms for "gaslighting" are
MANIPULATING, DECEIVING, FINAGLING, HOODWINKING, SWINDLING, HEAD GAMES, MIND GAMES, PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE
synonyms for "gaslighting"
The last, or almost the last, question the moderators tried to trick Vance was about the 2020 election.
They said that all 50 governors certified the votes.
However, more than half the country, Vance, Trump, and I all agree that the election was stolen. It can't be proven, but it can't be proven that it was fair, either.
This is where the synonyms for "gaslighting" come into useful and enlightening play.
Now consider the words DECEIVING, HOODWINKING, SWINDLING.
They mean YOU BEEN HAD YOU BEEN TRICKED YOU BEEN SWINDLED
and, by definition, those words and phrases mean they did it in such a way that it'll be hard or impossible to PROVE.
THERE ARE MANY DIFFERENT STANDARDS OF PROOF.
In the case of the election, these standards (and there are others) come to mind for me
1. was it typical or was it strangely, oddly different? (i.e. "something funny's going on here")
2. "Cui bono" or "who benefits." "cui bono is a principle that suggests that someone who has something to gain is likely responsible for an event or act."
3. Math, Statistics, Probability. "What are the odds...?" For example, "the reason that there's $100,000 sitting on my table wrapped in rubber bands
like the $100,000 that was sitting on your table an hour ago, also wrapped in rubber bands is...um...because...um space aliens came down and stunned me
(but I could still see what they did) and they took your money and flew away...and the money on my table is just money I had stored in my mattress
that I had wrapped up like that."
We can see that in standard 3 example, all three standards are addressed,
NOT TYPICAL, WHO BENEFITS, and how probable is it that SPACE ALIENS CAME DOWN and did it?
4. Motive, Means, and Opportunity are also consideration when considering malfeasance (fancy word for wrong-doing or crime or election fraud).
WHY AM I VERY CERTAIN THAT THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN?
Well, on election day in November, 2020, I had to drive North, leaving El Paso and heading to Middletown, Pennsylvania.
Late at night (let's say around midnight), I stopped at a convenience store that had a tv on with the news channel on and with election results coming.
Trump was ahead ... not by a little. It wasn't a nailbiter. Trump was ahead and was on his way to victory.
By morning it had flip-flopped DRAMATICALLY...hmmm
a. that violated number 1., above. That was strange, oddly different.
b. cui bono. who benefits? the Democrats
that also answers standard 4., above. The Democrats had means, motive, and opportunity by planning it ahead.
They had just shown their adeptness at coups that summer, when Bloomberg (on a Thursday, I believe) told all the other Democratic Presidential candidaates
that they should withdraw to prevent Sanders from winning the nomination.
By Monday they had all withdrawn. Boy oh Boy! Does that ever fit 1, 2, 3, and 4, above!
And then, of course, immediately there were believable reports of 3 a.m. shenanigans with votes thrown out by the boxload in trucks,
and new boxes of votes being sneaked in by the truckload.
It all fits in with a pre-plan to have just enough votes to win, by hook or by crook.
But primarily, it was Statistics. I'm a math teacher. I was always good at math. Statistics and Probability work.
That's why they take polls over and over, and take they seriously.
When you flip coins, you're going to get about 50% heads and 50% tails. The more you flip, the closer the percentages come to 50/50.
You flip 2 coins, you could easily get 100/0 or 0/100
You flip 4 coins, you could get 100/0 or 0/100 but it would take more tries.
You flip 100,000 coins, you're getting 50/50 almost really, really close.
So, when I saw how DRAMATICALLY the votes shifted, UNUSUALLY, STRANGELY overnight I realized right away that was quite improbable.
You know, the guy nobody listened to, who blew the whistle on Madoff the big fraudster, said that he knew in minutes that it was a Ponzi Scheme.
It was simple math.
So the math alone said it, but you also had the Means, Motive and Opportunity as Bloomberg and the Democratic Machine had proven with the Sanders coup.
Now some in the lamestream media are gaslighting us (tricking us) and some in the media are clueless and have been tricked themselves.
But we know what's up, and now you've doubled down with the hoodwinking which only makes us more certain.
I mean, for goodness sake, you just tried to assassinate Trump twice.
YOU'VE PROVEN OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER...THAT YOU'LL DO ANYTHING ANYTHING ANYTHING TO KEEP TRUMP FROM BEING PRESIDENT!
THE ELECTION 2020 WAS STOLEN!
WE KNOW IT!
AND YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GASLIGHT US
MANIPULATING, DECEIVING, FINAGLING, HOODWINKING, SWINDLING, HEAD GAMES, MIND GAMES, PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE!
So, stop with your false claims that the 2020 election wasn't stolen. It clearly was,
and you're displaying your mental illness.
